NavigationSimilar entriesUser login
Loading...
Archive by terms |
Forgiveness Without Repentance
Look, just ask your spouse which they'd rather hear when you have wrong them and you'll see what I mean. But what is worse is there are some people who claim to be Christians saying that a person need not repent before they are forgiven. Can you forgive a person without their repentance? Yes indeed. Is it following the biblical pattern? For example; does Jesus just summarily forgive everyone without repentance or does the Bible call people to REPENT and believe?
So then, for Calvinists, or rather Christians in general is WHY will a person repent and believe? Is it because some egotistical seminarian blathers on and on or footnotes some obscure theologian? No, the Bible clearly says why people repent and believe:
Perhaps a person will argue from Lk 23:34 where Jesus was on the Cross and says: “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” However WHO is the "they" in this context? Some of the same people who claim you should forgive people without repentance say Jesus was calling for the blanket forgiveness of the Jews and especially the Pharisees who seemed to know He was probably the Christ yet still wanted Him crucified. Rather, let's read the rest of Lk 23:34 - And they divided up his clothes by casting lots. This should give us a bit more insight as to who the THEY is in this context. Was it the Jews or specifically the Pharisees that divided up Jesus' clothing among them? It is interesting that there is even some dispute as to whether Luke 23:34 was in some early manuscripts. (ref1 (ref2). However, I am in no way saying the Bible has errors. I'm saying the same as the first reference seems to imply; that if some copyists assumed the appeal was to forgive the Jews, apparently God did not since Jerusalem was destroyed anyway. Rather, if we keep to the context that the appeal for forgiveness for people who didn't know what they were doing was in reference to the Romans; then there is no difficulty. For the person who tries to use Lk 23:34 to justify their erroneous doctrine of summarily forgiving people without repentance, they lose on several accounts.
We should ALWAYS be ready and willing to forgive (see Mt 18:21-22 and Lk 17:4-5). But it does require repentance. It is not simply so that you can feel vindicated or get your "pound of flesh". Forgiveness without repentance is damaging to the person you are forgiving if they know they have sinned against you. Luke 17:3-5 couldn't be clearer:
Notice the IF THEY REPENT clause. Do we often summarily forgive people who may have sinned against us without knowing and whom we will never pursue to point out that sin? Yes. As a matter of fact, we Christians should always be praying that we are forgiven for unknowingly "trespassing" against others. In the course of a day we may do things in offense to others that we aren't even aware is an offense. However, known sins should be dealt with as directly prescribed by the Bible. As you can see, even the apostles requested their faith be increased since forgiving repeat offenders is a difficult thing to do. But even here, the offend FIRST repents. There is no call for them to be summarily forgiven. It would be destructive to forgive people without repentance. In soteriologyi, forgiveness without repentance is universalismi; where everyone is saved no matter what. As we have seen, the Bible is clear that belief and repentance is required and even that is only by the enabling of the person by God. So, next time you hear someone offer or urge forgiveness without repentance; consider their motivation for it. Why would a person want to pass over this very important and biblical step?
|
Cumulus Tag CloudDon't Worry, Be HappySearchTKC Optimal Search Poll |