The Real Story About The So-called 'Dark Ages"

Dark AgesHistory in general is an often manipulated tool since most of us find it boring we easily believe the popular portrayal. For example, the so-called "Dark-Ages" was a period we think of as...well..."dark" or not too enLIGHTened. We think of superstitious religious beliefs holding back advancement in the arts and sciences. Much of this is blamed on Christianity.

To hear the popular portrayal, Christianity held back advancements by suppressing intellectual pursuit. But is this the real story?

Let's look at history with a little more citation. Christianity, no matter what one thinks of it otherwise has been an uniting force. By 313AD Christianity technically became the official religion of the Roman Empire, and effectively of the world. (source) With the domination of Christianity over the world; the great centers of learning, such as Alexandria Egypt were greatly enhanced by Christian scholarship that preserved much of the Greek philosophies. Also, Constantinople, the new capital of the Christian Roman Empire not only was a remarkable feat in architecture, but it too housed libraries. (source) As a matter of fact, it was Constantine that pushed for ancient texts to be copied from papyrus to parchment, a much more durable format. Much of the preserved texts were not necessarily Christian religious works. The man tasked with preservation of these works was Themistius, himself not a Christian. However, such a tolerance and actually a love for knowledge in general is a Christian attribute. (source) The point is, because of the rise of Christianity, knowledge has been pursued and preserved unlike it has ever been before.

Which brings us to the notion of the "Dark Ages". Again this is supposedly a time roughly between the years 475 to 1453 and interestedly enough is marked by the decline of the Christian Roman Empire. (source) As the Christian Roman Empire deteriorated, the concern for the protection, preservation and advancement of knowledge also deteriorated.

The concept of "Dark Ages" was coined, coincidentally by a Christian writer named Petrarch in the 1330s. But as we look at history we can see there was even a more distinct cause for the "Dark Ages", especially as it engulfed Europe.

With the rise of Islam, and the eventual destruction of the remaining Alexandria and Constantinople libraries by the Muslims, advancement in knowledge ceased to expand. Europe was more concerned with fighting off the encroachment by the Moors (Muslims). As a matter of fact, the entire history we Americans learned in school, about the explorers trying to find a passage to the East and thus stumbling upon America came about because the Muslims cut off the land route and the route via the Mediterranean. It wasn't like the Europeans (formerly Roman provinces) suddenly forgot how to travel east. Thus Islam, is in a large part responsible for the decline in advancement and for the European "Dark Ages".

Quoting from the Wikipedia source:

"Some Byzantinists [or Constantinople writers] have used the term "Byzantine Dark Ages" to refer to the period from the earliest Muslim conquests to about 800 AD, because there are no extant historical texts in Greek from this period, and thus the history of the Byzantine Empire and formerly Byzantine territories that were conquered by the Muslims is poorly understood and must be reconstructed from other types of contemporaneous sources, such as religious texts. It is also known that very few Greek manuscripts were copied in this period, indicating that the seventh and eighth centuries, which were a period of crisis for the Byzantines because of the Muslim conquests, were also less intellectually active than other periods."

Further, the Islamic link to intellectual decline is found in this quote from the same source:

"...the Arab Empire is often considered to have experienced its Golden Age rather than Dark Age; consequently, this usage of the term must also differentiate geographically. While Petrarch's concept of a Dark Age corresponded to a mostly Christian period following pre-Christian Rome, the use of the term today applies mainly to those cultures and periods in Europe least Christianized and thus most sparsely covered by chronicles and other contemporary sources, nearly all written by Catholic clergy at this date."

The Golden Age of Islam happened only AFTER Islam took over the Christian strongholds and plundered Greco-Roman-Christian knowledge and withheld it from future Greco-Roman-Christians. The idea that Islam has "contributed" scientifically is yet another false history (see here).

Especially telling is this quote:

"The meteoric rise of Islam closed off any further European exploration or exploitation of the spice routes. Conversely, a whole new world was opened up for the merchants of the Muslim world. Their newly found power allowed them to venture deep into Asia as never before. The Islamic texts give the first detailed descriptions of the emporiums of the East. By at least the ninth century, a massive trade ensued between the two regions greatly enriching the the Islamic caliphate. Magnificent cities and buildings were constructed throughout the Muslim lands at the same time that Europe sunk into the dark ages." -- source

So, to conclude if there is blame for the so-called Dark Ages, it is squarely with Islam as it has been shown to supplant the more tolerant and knowledge-loving Christianity. To this day, Islam is more like a 7th century tribal cult whereas Christianity has always best advanced through dialogue and debate where Islam seeks to advance through violence and hostility. Christianity has brought "light" where Islam brought "darkness" and Islam continues to bring "darkness" as it attempts to thrust the world into its 7th century Arabian tribal cult mentality.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Hello How can you say the

Hello
How can you say the following:
By 313AD Christianity technically became the official religion of the Roman Empire, and effectively of the world...
What about half of Asia the whole of Africa. and then america?

This shows me how inconsiderate you are to the other histories and races as well as other religions.

Christianity is no more believable then any other of the religions out there and there for i look for reason why i should follow a religion and i still have to be shown it. I am agnostic right now since i do believe that there is a higher power or a "God" but why chose our planet out of the billions of trillions of other planets out there.

Concerning the World

Firstly, you do bring up a good point about the effect Christianity had on the world, however, you should know by 313AD, the Roman Empire was the main super power of the world (Just how anything effecting the USA would technically effect the world). In turn, since became the official religion of the Roman Empire, we can conclude that the religion spread throughout the globe. In 313AD there was a large boost in Christian believers due to the influence of the Roman Empire. However, you are correct as to the effects of Christianity in the Americas. The Americas were yet to be discovered, and so was not influenced by the storm of Christianity, however, at the time, the Americas were approximated to have a very low overall population (Which would eventually grow by the 14th and 15th centuries) so you can effectively take them out of the "World", if that makes any sense.