History
In almost everybody there is a certain tendency of romanticism. There is this look at a past, where things were better. Maybe it is in one's personal life, or at some point of history where life seems to have been better or more exciting than our daily life right now and here. People reenact the Middle Ages, the renaissance, the Civil War, playfully sometimes, and sometimes out of a deep longing for a golden age.
There is also a variation of this romanticism in Christianity. Christians who see the heroes of the faith in the past and compare them with what appears to them a far less appealing present long for the good old times--it might be the Jerusalem of the apostles, the Wittenberg of Luther and Melanchthon, the St. Louis of C. F. W. Walther and Francis Pieper, or another time and place. But there was never this age where the church was unanimous, where there was no strife and struggle, where everybody lived in peace and harmony. Reading the New Testament shows us congregations loaded with problems. Any study of church history gives us a picture of a church in distress. And how else could it be in this world, in this age, where sin is still here, where the devil still tries to destroy God's holy Church through false doctrine and temptation to a sinful life? But how do you deal with the problems of the Church? How can you fight heresy and how can you stop new and strange ideas of what is the proper godly behavior of a Christian?
One of the answers given in the course of the history of the church is that councils decide points at issue. Councils were assemblies of bishops, either of a certain area, or of all Christian countries, the so-called ecumenical councils (ecumenical means here universal, it has nothing to do with the modern ecumenical movement). There is an impressive series of these ecumenical councils, starting with the Council at Nicea 325.
In the late Middle Ages there was a universally-felt need for reform in the Roman Catholic Church. So several "reform councils" met, but they did not succeed. One of the reasons was that the Pope sabotaged any efforts to diminish his power. And, as it is often in organizations, the bureaucracy won against boards that meet only from time to time. When the Reformation movement started, the urge for a council became even greater. But the Pope was busy waging war against the emperor. When there was finally peace, a council was announced, and then postponed, and then transferred, and then again postponed, and after that delayed and so on, since the Pope did not want to have a meeting that was not under his total control. This went on for 14 years, and only after Luther's death was there finally a council in Trent. But it was no fair hearing, no free council, but an assembly in which the Pope set and controlled the agenda. Lutherans were not even admitted for a hearing.
A Fox News article reports how researchers have found a tablet that supposedly records the destruction of Sodom & Gomorrah by an asteroid-like object. Even if this were true, it does not refute that such an event could have been caused by God, as depicted in the Bible. If anything, it only validates the Bible further as a book not of mere fables but of factual, historical events.
See the entire article here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,343674,00.html
I have purposely allowed your blog postings to this site because it has been attracting an audience that needs to be reached with the message of Christ -- that message is not the message of Islam. That message is not even the message of "democracy" since even America which is considered by those outside of America as the "Christian nation", as the "democratic nation" -- even America is not a democracy but rather a REPUBLIC. It was not meant to be a "one man one vote" nation but rather a representative nation -- not necessarily representing EVERY person -- such as we do not let convicts vote, we are not supposed to count the votes of illegal immigrants & such.
A true democracy is merely one step away from anarchy & it seems the world is quickly lurching ever closer to that possibility. How does this tie in with your blog & me allowing you to write here?
Perhaps relevant to the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary but from the Christian worldview is the question of should the Gospel be used to promote a social or political agenda?
During the campaign of Democrat frontrunner, Barack Obama it came out that Obama’s pastor, Jeremiah Wright had been preaching not so much the Christian Gospel as much as he had been preaching an Afro-centric “Liberation Theology”.
Liberation Theology manifests itself in many forms such as; Afro-centric/Black Theology, Feminist Theology, Homosexual Theology, down to basic postmodernism & “Social Gospel“ but the basic premise underlying all various Liberation Theologies is simply to use Christianity as a vehicle to advance some social or political agenda.
In this day in age we are told to be “moderates”, “bi-partisans”, “independents”, “open-minded”, “tolerant” among other synonyms that all boil down to being a compromiser. Ideas become nothing but mere opinions to be accepted or rejected with no more validity than the next.
If you adhere strongly to an ideology you will quickly be labeled “extreme”, “partisan”, “rigid”, “close-minded”, “intolerant”, perhaps even “mean-spirited”. Ideology becomes irrelevant & inconsequential in the face of so many ecumenicists. Sure, people will wear their ideals like a boyscout patch but hardly will they ever push their propositions beyond the comfort zone. Be it political or theological ideology it seems the days when ideals meant something is gone. We are left with vague concepts that speak from the “heart” -- as if the heart & mind are disconnected.
THE WHITEFIELD & WESLEY EXAMPLE
One of the most often used examples of why we Christians should be ecumenical in our dealings with other people who advocate & support false doctrine while calling on the name of Christ is the relationship of George Whitefield & John Wesley.
For a little background, Whitefield & Wesley were Methodist preachers in the mid-1700s. While Whitefield followed in the Protestant & Reformed theology which advocated God's predestination of believers & grace, Wesley adopted the Arminian concept of man's freewill & only God's foreknowledge but not fore-ordination of believers. Perhaps this would not have caused such a problem except that as Whitefield went to America to preach, he left his ministry in England to Wesley & Wesley's brother Charles.
To make matters worse Wesley planned to publish a sermon against predestination. Whitefield wrote Wesley privately saying:
According to the Associated Press, "Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul's supporters raised over $6 million Sunday to boost the 10-term congressman's campaign for the White House."
The AP report also said, "The [Paul] campaign's previous fundraiser brought in $4.2 million."
According to the Paul campaign website, "In a 24-hour period on December 16, the campaign raised $6.026 million dollars, surpassing the one-day record of $5.7 million held by John Kerry.
"During the day, over 58,000 people contributed to Dr. Paul's campaign, including 24,940 first-time donors. Over 118,000 Americans have donated to the campaign in the fourth quarter.
"The $6 million one-day total means the campaign has raised over $18 million this quarter, far exceeding its goal of $12 million."
Now, if one listens to most of the political pundits in the major media, Ron Paul is some kind of "kook," and his supporters are also a bunch of "kooks." So, the question must be asked, Just who are these kooks that are supporting him, and why are they giving Ron Paul all this money?
As this site is NOT a 501C3 entity I can openly endorse any political candidate I desire, however this is a theological website & not a political website so I am going to refrain from delving too far into politics. I do want to touch on the state of the current Republican Presidential candidates. I'm only going to focus on the Republicans because for the life of me I cannot figure out how a Christan can square their Christianity with the Democrat Party. Oh, I've seen some try, typically by claiming Jesus' mission was to the poor & so is the Democrat Party. Riiiiiight! Charity is much different than extortion. We'll say no more about the Democrat Party.
When Christians look at the field of Republican candidates they must be disillusioned. The field includes no one that would resemble Christian principles. I'm not saying the person has to have the exact same beliefs before I'll vote for them but come on –
With Christmas in the American psyche for over 200 years now, it is difficult to think of the season without this celebration. But do we ever stop to think of the origin of Christmas? Is it really about the birth of Jesus some 2000 plus years ago or is it a pagan holiday that has been “christianized” & repackaged into the commercial powerhouse it is today?
Sometimes as I begin to write articles like this, there is a little voice in the back of my mind that says, “leave well enough alone” – that is, why can’t we just embrace the Norman Rockwellian tradition that Christmas has become & just leave it at that? But in pursuit of truth, we press on.
With all the hype about “postmodern” forms of Christianity as presented by trendy teachers such as Brian McLaren, Rob Bell, & Leonard Sweet you’d think that classic Protestantism – also known as Reformed Christianity, also known as “Calvinism” is all but dead.
But don’t count Reformed Christianity out so fast, as it appears to be making quite a come back.
According to an article in the Sept 2006 edition of Christianity Today, Reformed Christianity may be drawing more young Christians than the presumptuous “hip” Emergent Conversation/Church. Perhaps it is due to the fact that the emotionally laden form of postmodernism fails to deliver the rich & fulfilling experience that classic Reformed Theology had delivered long before Fundamentalism supplanted it over 200 years ago.
I have purposely placed John Calvin at the end of this series commemorating the Protestant Reformation not only because I have been presenting the various personalities in somewhat chronological order of influence but also because now-a-days so many people erroneously use the terms "Reformed" & "Calvinism" interchangeably. But it is neither fair to Calvin or to all the other Reformers to simply identify the Reformed perspective by one man’s name.
Before we address that further, let us explore John Calvin the man.
Like Martin Luther before him, Calvin originally studied to be a lawyer but instead turned his attention toward Christ & understanding the Bible. He would soon be running from the Roman Catholic authorities after it was rumored that he was the author behind a Reformist speech given by one of his friends. He fled France disguised as a farmer. He wandered parts of Europe for three years under assumed names until finally arriving in Geneva Switzerland in about 1536.

|
Recent comments
2 days 2 hours ago
2 days 12 hours ago
3 days 13 hours ago
5 days 11 hours ago
5 days 12 hours ago
5 days 12 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
3 weeks 18 hours ago
3 weeks 5 days ago
3 weeks 5 days ago